Following my article on the factors that influence loyalty after processing a claim, I received a question from a reader regarding B2B claims management. The reader asked me if there were any research studies on the subject and what their conclusions were.
In this article, I analyse for you the findings of research on B2B complaints handling and the factors that play a role in customer satisfaction.
If you only have 30 seconds
- Research on the handling of customer complaints generally uses the framework of perceived justice to measure the factors that influence customer satisfaction.
- A 2013 research (Brock et al.) on 440 B2B buyers shows that personal interactions with the seller have no significant effect on their satisfaction (so-called “interactional justice”).
- These results differ significantly from customer complaints in B2C, where the interactional component is well present.
The majority of research on customer complaints is in B2C
The majority of research on customer complaints is (logically) conducted in B2C. Transactions are more frequent, and customers are more accessible. In a landmark meta-analysis, Orsingher et al. (2010) reviewed 50 empirical research studies on customer complaints. All were B2C.
The academic articles I published on the subject were also in the B2C field because this type of claim is often the only one that is accessible.
It was therefore welcome that a research study should attempt to clarify the mechanisms of customer satisfaction and complaint handling in B2B.
Research on the handling of complaints in B2B
The research in question (Brock et al., 2013) was published in 2013 in the International Journal of Research in Marketing. It seeks to apply to a sample of B2B buyers the framework of perceived justice (see box below for more details) that is so often used in research on customer complaints. This framework revolves around distributive justice (the compensation obtained), interactional justice (the interaction with the company and the employee representing it), procedural justice (the procedures for securing redress).
The authors interviewed 3,000 buyers of professional products and services and managed to gather a sample of 440 people who had claimed in the previous 12 months.
The results show that only the dimensions of distributive justice and procedural justice play a role. Interactional justice, on the other hand, seems (surprisingly) to have no significant effect on customer satisfaction after the complaint has been processed.
What questions should be asked when researching customer satisfaction after a complaint?
Most research on customer complaints focuses on measuring customer satisfaction after a complaint has been processed. The reason for this is simple: a well-treated complaint raises the level of satisfaction and ensures customer loyalty.
In this kind of analysis, the framework of “perceived justice” is usually used. This framework makes it possible to study several dimensions of customer complaint handling and to define which one(s) has (have) the most significant effect on post-claim satisfaction. The questions to be asked are as follows:
- distributive justice: did you receive adequate compensation from the company? Did you receive as much as in other similar claims? Was the solution provided what you expected? Was the settlement received fair?
- procedural justice: did the company react quickly to the claim? Did the company allow you to explain your point of view? In general, was the handling of the complaint fair?
- interactional justice: did the employees show interest in your complaint? Did the employees understand precisely what your problem was? Were the exchanges polite? Were the employees interested in solving your problem? Was the behaviour of the employees during the handling of the complaint fair?
Wouldn’t customer interactions be beneficial in B2B?
The results obtained by Brock and his colleagues differ significantly from those obtained in another research. Thus, in a B2C context, the 3 dimensions of perceived justice generally play a role in post-claim satisfaction. In B2B, the research by Yanamandram and White (2010) found a significant effect of interactional justice, i.e. interpersonal relations between a buyer and a seller in B2B had an impact on post-claim satisfaction.
Of course, not all research is the same. Brock et al. (2013) argue that the clients they surveyed appear to be more rational than others. As a result, they would rely on more factual assessments of their claims handling.
- Brock, C., Blut, M., Evanschitzky, H., & Kenning, P. (2013). Satisfaction with complaint handling: A replication study on its determinants in a business-to-business context. International journal of research in marketing, 30(3), 319-322.
- Orsingher, C., Valentini, S., & De Angelis, M. (2010). A meta-analysis of satisfaction with complaint handling in services. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 38(2), 169-186.
- Yanamandram, V., & White, L. (2010). An empirical analysis of the retention of dissatisfied business services customers using structural equation modelling. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 18(4), 222-232.§